Difference between revisions of "Initiatives, Referenda and Recall"

Latest revision as of 04:32, 3 November 2016

Initiatives, Referenda and Recall

The Green Party supports initiative, referendum and recall as essential tools of direct democracy; and the Green Party seeks to retain and enhance these important institutions.

The strength of the initiative process is that it gives citizens the ability to by-pass the legislature and act directly as legislators. Through the initiative process, citizens can propose statutes and amendments to the California Constitution -- a critical option, especially when elected officials are deemed un-responsive by their constituents.

The weakness of the initiative process is the degree to which its components can be determined by big money -- from qualifying for the ballot, to waging statewide election campaigns. Too often the initiative process has become a large-scale commercial and fundraising enterprise. It can cost millions of dollars and require a great deal of organization just to gather the necessary signatures to qualify for the ballot. Then there is the private, for-profit role that signature-gathering companies play in determining the cost of access to our democracy.

In response, Greens support making it easier for volunteer-based efforts to qualify initiatives, referendum and recall, and propose different ways this could occur. During the election season, Greens support ensuring television and radio time for informational programming; pro/con debates for each statewide ballot measure; and contribution and spending limits for pro/con campaigns. At the same time, Greens support increasing financial disclosure for all ballot measures.

The Green Party proposes:

Signature Gathering

- Make it easier to qualify an initiative or referendum proposal using volunteers, by extending the number of days to qualify for the ballot for signature-gathering efforts that utilize large percentages of volunteers and stay within spending limits, and/or weigh more highly the signatures obtained utilizing volunteers

- Where is is possible to truly safeguard security, identity and privacy, allow signature gathering for initiative and referendum via the Internet and/or other electronic technology.

Drafting, 'Title and Summary

- Initiative proposals should be limited to a single subject. The definition of “single subject” should ensure clear interpretation and strict enforcement.

- Initiatives with provisions that would require funding should specify the sources or method(s) of providing the funding.

- The title and summary should be written by an impartial and non-partisan official authority, such as the Legislative Analyst's Office (for statewide measures).

Voting and Approval Thresholds

- An initiative statute, or a legislative statute appearing on the ballot as a referendum, should be approved by a simple majority of those voting on the measure.

- An initiative statute or constitutional amendment that imposes a new requirement for passage of future initiatives should meet the same requirement.

- An initiative statute or constitutional amendment that requires a super-majority vote for passage of future related issues should be required to receive the same super-majority vote approval for its passage.

- An initiative should not be allowed to provide for different outcomes depending upon the percentage of votes cast in its favor.

- The approval threshold to approve an initiative constitutional amendment should be higher than a simple majority vote, but only after a cleaning up of the state constitution to separate what belongs in a constitution and what is an initiative statute

Elections

- Provide free time for informational television and radio information about the initiative and referendum proposals on the ballot, and broadcast any public hearings the Legislature holds on the initiative proposals.

- Impose contribution and expenditure limits by individuals and groups in initiative and referendum campaigns - mandatory limits where possible by law, and voluntary when not.

- Conduct a series of televised debates featuring the yes and no sides of initiative and referendum proposals, similar to the pro/con arguments in the voter information guide - but only for campaigns accepting and operating within voluntary spending limits.

Disclosure

- Require that disclosure requirements that already apply to mailings and advertisements in support or opposition to an initiative or referendum, also apply to disclosure in the ballot pamphlet and voter information guide for those ballot measures

- Require that that at least the top three sponsors of an initiative or referendum and organizations that form a committee to support or oppose a measure be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in advertisements.

- Require that at least the top three principal contributors to an initiative or referendum campaign be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in advertisements.

- Where an initiative or referendum campaign has substantially qualified for the ballot through signature-gathering by volunteers, include this with other disclosure information.

- Require that initiative and referendum committees use names that reflect their true economic or special interest.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Initiatives, Referenda and Recall'''
-The Green Party believes that the initiative/referendum/recall process is an essential part of California politics and, on balance, a useful way of furthering grassroots democracy.
+The Green Party supports initiative, referendum and recall as essential tools of direct democracy; and the Green Party seeks to retain and enhance these important institutions.
-Past elections have seen an abundance of initiatives that have been variously received by the voters.
+The strength of the initiative process is that it gives citizens the ability to by-pass the legislature and act directly as legislators. Through the initiative process, citizens can propose statutes and amendments to the California Constitution -- a critical option, especially when elected officials are deemed un-responsive by their constituents.
-Perhaps the most damaging elements of the California initiative process from a Green perspective are the cost and time constraints involved in ballot qualification. In order to qualify, supporters must gather the signatures of five percent of the registered voters within 150 days. In practice, considerable organizational talent and large sums of money are needed to qualify (at least 50 cents per signature). The professionals who gather such signatures are not interested in educating the voters about the issues. They have found that many Californians, when properly approached, will put an initiative on the ballot without knowing more about it than its title.
-Currently, changes in the law are being planned that would make the process even less accessible to voters.
-The Green Party supports the use of petitionary referenda as a viable recourse in keeping elected officials sensitive to significant issues and public opinion. The petitionary referenda gives citizens the chance to repeal bills recently passed by the legislature and approved by the governor.
-In contrast to the initiative, the use of petitionary referenda is in decline - only six petitionary referenda have qualified for the ballot since 1940. This is due, in part, to the referendum process: proponents of a referendum must gather a number of signatures equal to five percent of the votes cast for the governor in the last election, and must do so within 90 days of the bill's passage. The referendum process excludes certain types of bills such as tax levies, appropriation measures, calls for special elections, etc.
+The weakness of the initiative process is the degree to which its components can be determined by big money -- from qualifying for the ballot, to waging statewide election campaigns. Too often the initiative process has become a large-scale commercial and fundraising enterprise. It can cost millions of dollars and require a great deal of organization just to gather the necessary signatures to qualify for the ballot. Then there is the private, for-profit role that signature-gathering companies play in determining the cost of access to our democracy.
-As in the case of the initiative and referendum, the recall process gives citizens a chance to practice grassroots democracy by removing elected officials who are disapproved of by a majority of voters.
-Rarely has a recall effort against a state-level officeholder ever qualified for the ballot. It has sometimes been abused by groups seeking political ends other than removing an officeholder who they feel has performed poorly. Also, some citizens simply don't understand the meaning of the term "recall."
-The Green Party proposes:
+In response, Greens support making it easier for volunteer-based efforts to qualify initiatives, referendum and recall, and propose different ways this could occur. During the election season, Greens support ensuring television and radio time for informational programming; pro/con debates for each statewide ballot measure; and contribution and spending limits for pro/con campaigns. At the same time, Greens support increasing financial disclosure for all ballot measures.
-'''Initiatives'''
+----
-The Green Party advocates reforming the initiative process:
+'''The Green Party proposes:'''
-Extend the period of time for gathering signatures to 180 days.
-Require that at least 15% of all signatures be gathered by unpaid volunteers.
-Require both proponents and opponents of an initiative to inform the voters about the issues, using government-sponsored means.
-Require that organizational proponents of initiatives be prominently listed at the beginning of every initiative.
+'''Signature Gathering'''
-Drafting
+- Make it easier to qualify an initiative or referendum proposal using volunteers, by extending the number of days to qualify for the ballot for signature-gathering efforts that utilize large percentages of volunteers and stay within spending limits, and/or weigh more highly the signatures obtained utilizing volunteers
-Initiative sponsors should be required to submit draft proposals to an impartial and nonpartisan, official authority, such as the Legislative Analyst’s Office (for statewide measures), for a precirculation review of clarity/language, constitutionality/legality, and single subject.
-The opinion resulting from the precirculation review should be made public.
-Initiative proposals should be limited to a single subject.
-Initiative proposals should be written in language that is precise, clear, and understandable and meets standards of readability.
-Initiatives should include a provision providing for an automatic review or expiration of the measure, as appropriate.
-Initiatives with provisions that would require funding should specify the sources or method(s) of providing the funding.
-TItie and Summary
+- Where is is possible to truly safeguard security, identity and privacy, allow signature gathering for initiative and referendum via the Internet and/or other electronic technology.
-The title and summary should be written by an impartial and nonparitsan offical authority, such as the Legislative Analyst's Office (for statewide meaures).
+'''Drafting, 'Title and Summary'''
-.   Signature Gathering
+- Initiative proposals should be limited to a single subject. The definition of “single subject” should ensure clear interpretation and strict enforcement.
+- Initiatives with provisions that would require funding should specify the sources or method(s) of providing the funding.
-    a.  If appropriate security safeguards are in place, Internet and/or other electronic technology should be allowed for signature gathering.
+- The title and summary should be written by an impartial and non-partisan official authority, such as the Legislative Analyst's Office (for statewide measures).
-    b.  California should have a system of registration and training for signature gatherers.
-. Qualification
+'''Voting and Approval Thresholds'''
-     a.  Requirements should be retained for:
+- An initiative statute, or a legislative statute appearing on the ballot as a referendum, should be approved by a simple majority of those voting on the measure.
-) direct initiative statute--valid signatures numbering 5 percent of the total vote for all candidates for governor in the gubernatorial election, 150 days to collect signatures;
+- An initiative statute or constitutional amendment that imposes a new requirement for passage of future initiatives should meet the same requirement.
-) direct initiatie constitutional amendment--valid signatures numbering 8 percent of the total vote for all candidates for governor in the gubernatorial election, 150 days to collect signatures;
+- An initiative statute or constitutional amendment that requires a super-majority vote for passage of future related issues should be required to receive the same super-majority vote approval for its passage.
-    b.  The filing fee should reflect costs of processing initiative and referendum proposals.
+- An initiative should not be allowed to provide for different outcomes depending upon the percentage of votes cast in its favor.
-    c.  No requirement for geographic distribution should be imposed.
-    d.  Solicitation of signatures and campaign funds in the same mailing should be allowed.
-    e.  The standard to qualify an initiative constitutional amendment should be higher than that for an initiative statute.
-.    Campaign
+- The approval threshold to approve an initiative constitutional amendment should be higher than a simple majority vote, but only after a cleaning up of the state constitution to separate what belongs in a constitution and what is an initiative statute
-    a.  Realistic limits should be imposed on contributions by individuals and groups to initiative and referendum campaigns.
+'''Elections'''
-    b.  Realistic limits should be imposed on expenditures by individuals and groups in initiative and referendum campaigns.
-    c.  There should be provision for free time for radio and TV information programs for initiative campaigns.
-    d.  No public financing should be provided for initiative and referendum campaigns.
-    e.  The legislature should conduct public hearings on initiative and referendum proposals around the state, with adequate public notice.
-    f.  Ballot pamphlet analyses of initiative and referendum measures should be written for the reading level of the average citizen.
-    g.  The ballot label and ballot pamphlet should clearly indicate the effect of a yes vote and a no vote.
-.  Disclosure
+- Provide free time for informational television and radio information about the initiative and referendum proposals on the ballot, and broadcast any public hearings the Legislature holds on the initiative proposals.
-    a.  Sponsors of an initiative or referendum and organizations that form a committee to support or oppose a measure should be required to be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in advertisements.
+- Impose contribution and expenditure limits by individuals and groups in initiative and referendum campaigns - mandatory limits where possible by law, and voluntary when not.
-    b.  Principal contributors to an initiative or referendum campaign should be required to be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in advertisements.
-    c.  Initiative and referendum committees should be required to use names that reflect their true economic or special interest.
-.  Election
+- Conduct a series of televised debates featuring the yes and no sides of initiative and referendum proposals, similar to the pro/con arguments in the voter information guide - but only for campaigns accepting and operating within voluntary spending limits.
-    a.  Voting on initiatives should take place at primary and general elections but not at special elections.
+'''Disclosure'''
-    b.  An initiative statute, or a legislative statute appearing on the ballot as a referendum, should be approved by a simple majority of those voting on the measure to take effect.
-    c.  The standard to pass an initiative constitutional amendment should be higher than a simple majority vote.
-    d.  An initiative statute or constitutional amendment that imposes a new requirement for passage of future initiatives should meet the same requirement.
-    e.  An initiative statute or constitutional amendment that requires a supermajority vote for passage of future related issues should be required to receive the same supermajority vote approval for its passage.
-    f.  State initiative measures should apply to the entire state, not only to those political subdivisions in which they are approved.
-    g.  An initiative should not be allowed to provide for different outcomes depending upon the percentage of votes cast in its favor.
-.  Post-Election
+- Require that disclosure requirements that already apply to mailings and advertisements in support or opposition to an initiative or referendum, also apply to disclosure in the ballot pamphlet and voter information guide for those ballot measures
-    a.  Under limited circumstances, the legislature, without approval by the voters, should be allowed to amend a statute adopted by initiative.           Circumstances could include that the amendments are consistent with the original intent of the initiative or are made after a waiting period.
+- Require that that at least the top three sponsors of an initiative or referendum and organizations that form a committee to support or oppose a measure be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in advertisements.
-    b.  Approval by the voters should be required to amend constitutional amendments adopted by initiative
-    c.  If two or more initiatives with conflicting provisions pass at the same election, the initiative receiving the greatest number of votes should be enacted.
-    d.  Initiative proposals that do not win voter approval should be allowed to appear on subsequent ballots without restriction, if they again meet qualification requirements.
-.  Legal Aspects
+- Require that at least the top three principal contributors to an initiative or referendum campaign be listed by name in the ballot pamphlet, in mailings, and in advertisements.
-     a. The definition of “single subject” pertaining to initiatives should be redefined to ensure stricter interpretation and stricter enforcement.
+- Where an initiative or referendum campaign has substantially qualified for the ballot through signature-gathering by volunteers, include this with other disclosure information.
-     b.  Constitutional challenges to voter-approved initiatives being reviewed in t
-'''Referenda'''
+- Require that initiative and referendum committees use names that reflect their true economic or special interest.
-The Green Party recommends that we reactivate the referendum process:
-Require companies doing business in the California initiative industry to set aside a portion of their revenues and facilities for use by groups unable to pay full fare for such services.
-Reduce the number of signatures required to qualify a referendum for the ballot to three percent of the votes cast for the governor in the last election.
+----
-     a.  Requirements should be retained for:
-) referendum on a legislative statute—valid signatures numbering 5 percent of the total vote for all candidates for governor in the last gubernatorial election, 90 days to collect signatures.
-'''Recall'''
-The Green Party proposes simplifying the recall process:
-Substitute the term "removal" for "recall."
-Require all signatures for a removal effort be obtained through voluntary solicitation.

Difference between revisions of "Initiatives, Referenda and Recall"

Latest revision as of 04:32, 3 November 2016

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools