Difference between revisions of "Should GPCA's electoral focus be on localized, "non-partisan" elections?"

From CA Greens wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'Marnie Glickman: No. Kendra Gonzales (Ventura) No, high-profile campaigns give us alot more access to a larger audience such as the Sample Ballot, more media coverage...includi…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
CLICK ON THE EDIT TAB TO COMMENT, MAKE SURE TO SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK SAVE PAGE WHEN DONE.
 +
 +
 +
 
Marnie Glickman: No.
 
Marnie Glickman: No.
 
   
 
   
 
Kendra Gonzales (Ventura) No, high-profile campaigns give us alot more access to a larger audience such as the Sample Ballot, more media coverage...including "protest" when we are not "allowed" into debates. I consider Executive Office (Governor,etc)  campaigns as important as local seats. We simply need to be more strategic on how to support and organize both. Fundraise first quarter 2011, and we're on our way!
 
Kendra Gonzales (Ventura) No, high-profile campaigns give us alot more access to a larger audience such as the Sample Ballot, more media coverage...including "protest" when we are not "allowed" into debates. I consider Executive Office (Governor,etc)  campaigns as important as local seats. We simply need to be more strategic on how to support and organize both. Fundraise first quarter 2011, and we're on our way!

Revision as of 21:09, 21 January 2011

CLICK ON THE EDIT TAB TO COMMENT, MAKE SURE TO SCROLL DOWN AND CLICK SAVE PAGE WHEN DONE.


Marnie Glickman: No.

Kendra Gonzales (Ventura) No, high-profile campaigns give us alot more access to a larger audience such as the Sample Ballot, more media coverage...including "protest" when we are not "allowed" into debates. I consider Executive Office (Governor,etc) campaigns as important as local seats. We simply need to be more strategic on how to support and organize both. Fundraise first quarter 2011, and we're on our way!