Should GPCA continue to be a member of GPUS?

From CA Greens wiki
Revision as of 03:30, 17 June 2011 by Jenniwoo (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

CLICK ON THE EDIT TAB TO COMMENT. MAKE SURE TO SCROLL DOWN AND SAVE PAGE WHEN DONE.


Marnie Glickman: Yes.

Kendra Gonzales: Yes. That would be like asking local county Greens if they want to continue to be a member of GPCA. I'd imagine a few would say no!. Some locals (for lack of a better term) have indicated they think the State Party is completely dysfunctional. So, GPCA to GPUS is a mirror of County Green to GPCA. We need to remain as united as possible within our Decentralization values. There are much worse "issues" out in world (like climate change) that we need to deal with. So we've got to figure out how to work through our internal issues without getting stuck. I highly recommend www.cnvc.org (non-violent communications) Simple, and highly effective regardless of the situation.

Jennifer Woodward: Probably so, otherwise the GP looks foolish and on the way out. What are the concrete arguments against membership in the GPUS? How pervasive is the alleged dysfunction of GPCA? Who's complaining about it and why? Facts and more facts ought to make for better discussions and decision making. jgw110617